The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2025
Biedronka promised '100% back on a voucher' — the voucher bought almost nothing you wanted
'Buy this, get the value back as a free voucher', Biedronka's ads said. The voucher only worked on other categories, above a minimum spend. UOKiK: PLN 104.7M.
Jeronimo Martins Polska · 2025-12-01
What happened
Biedronka, Poland's biggest supermarket chain, ran two one-day campaigns in early 2024 — 'Specjalna Środa' and 'Walentynkowa Środa' — advertising a '100% return on a voucher': buy the promoted product and get its value back as a voucher, described as 'free'. The message ran on radio, in the app, on Facebook and in stores, implying shoppers could simply save on whatever they chose next. The vouchers worked differently.
Each voucher was locked to a product category unrelated to what the customer had bought: buying sausages yielded a voucher for fruits and vegetables, chocolate for cosmetics, meat for drinks or sweets. A voucher earned by buying Wedel's ptasie mleczko was valid only on juices, and only with a minimum spend of 25 zloty. One voucher per person; weighted products had return limits. None of this appeared in the advertising — the conditions lived in website regulations, on notice boards usually behind the checkout, and on the voucher itself, after purchase.
On 1 December 2025 UOKiK fined Jeronimo Martins Polska 104,722,016 zloty (decision RBG-5/2025) for intentionally infringing collective consumer interests. President Tomasz Chróstny set the standard: a marketing message must carry the information that matters most to consumers, at the right time, legibly and unambiguously — they should not have to hunt for it. The decision is not final and can be appealed.
Consumers had said it plainly in complaints UOKiK quoted: 'I got the voucher and it turned out to only allow buying laundry detergent.' 'What do tulips have in common with frozen food?'
Why it happened
- The promise and the voucher disagreed: 'free' money back that only worked on other categories, above minimum spends most vouchers didn't cover.
- The conditions existed — just not in the ad: website regulations, boards behind the checkout, and the voucher itself, all after purchase.
- UOKiK called it intentional: selecting and presenting ad content so that shoppers believe they save on products of their own choice is misleading.
The lesson
A promotion's conditions belong in the ad: Biedronka sold '100% back on a voucher' while hiding category locks and minimum spends — UOKiK fined it nearly PLN 105 million.
Aftermath
UOKiK's decision RBG-5/2025 of 1 December 2025 imposed 104,722,016 zloty for intentionally infringing collective consumer interests through the two early-2024 campaigns. The decision is not final; Jeronimo Martins Polska may appeal to court. Consumer complaints about vouchers that bought 'laundry detergent' and 'tulips vs frozen food' featured in the authority's reasoning.
Sources
- UOKiK: Gdy promocja nie mówi tego, co ważne — blisko 105 mln zł kary dla Biedronki (1 December 2025)
- Android.com.pl: Biedronka z karą 105 mln zł od UOKiK za promocje (December 2025)
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Albert Heijn's to-go price tag made a €3.95 sandwich look like €3, and the RCC upheld it
Lidl's '€16.78 cheaper basket' ad was suspended in Portugal — the comparison was rigged
Hydro Service ignored the ad watchdog's binding order — so it published their name
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.