The encyclopedia · Product & Design · Product decision · 1988–1990
Bic made pens, lighters and razors — then tried disposable underwear. Nobody wore it.
Bic made pens, lighters and razors — then tried disposable underwear. Consumers wanted nothing between their skin and a pen company.
Bic (Société Bic) · 1989
What happened
Bic built its name on disposable products that worked reliably and cost little: the ballpoint pen that wrote reliably, the disposable lighter that lit every time, and the disposable razor that gave a clean shave. By the 1980s, Bic was one of the most recognised brands in the world — a name synonymous with simplicity, disposability, and low cost. The company decided to extend that formula into a new category: disposable underwear.
The logic was straightforward: Bic understood disposability, knew low-cost manufacturing, and had a global distribution network. Disposable underwear — paper-based briefs for travellers, campers, or anyone who needed a fresh pair without laundry — seemed like a natural fit. Bic rolled out the product in test markets in the late 1980s, supported by the brand's massive recognition.
The problem was that consumers' association with Bic stopped at the office and the bathroom sink. The idea of wearing underwear from a pen company was not just unappealing — it was actively uncomfortable. Shoppers were not willing to trust a brand best known for writing instruments with something as personal as underwear. The product was pulled from shelves within a year or two. Bic never tried apparel again.
Why it happened
- Consumers did not trust a pen company to make underwear — the brand's association with office supplies was too strong for a product worn next to the skin
- Disposable underwear solved a problem few people had — travellers and campers did not need a branded solution, and the product was not compelling enough to create a new habit
- Bic's brand equity gave it permission to sell pens, lighters and razors, but not clothing — the stretch from stationery to underwear was too far for consumers to follow
The lesson
Brand extension is not a vending machine: putting a trusted name on a package does not make the product trusted. When the gap is too wide, consumers do not open their wallets — they open their eyes.
Aftermath
Bic's disposable underwear joined Colgate Kitchen Entrees and Harley-Davidson Fragrance in the brand extension hall of shame. Bic refocused on its core categories — pens, lighters, and razors — and later expanded into stationery, adhesives, and mobile phones, though none of those extensions matched the ubiquity of the original products. The underwear failure is taught in marketing courses as a limit case of brand stretch: a brand that stands for 'disposable' does not automatically stand for 'wearable.'
Sources
- Various marketing textbooks cite Bic disposable underwear as a classic brand extension failure from the late 1980s; no dedicated Wikipedia page exists
- The Guardian
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Harley-Davidson tried to sell perfume — and learned that bikers don't smell like flowers
Colgate launched frozen dinners — consumers couldn't eat past the toothpaste brand
Coca-Cola said no to Moscow — Pepsi won the Soviet market
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →
Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.