Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Finance & Accounting · Financial decision · 2005–2012

Barclays rigged Libor for years — and taught the world how to do it

Barclays traders rigged Libor to profit on derivatives and hide crisis weakness — fined $450M, CEO resigned, the scandal uncovered $9B in industry fraud.

Barclays · 2012-06-27

What happened

Barclays is one of Britain's oldest banks, founded in 1690, and one of the world's largest financial institutions. For years, its traders manipulated the London Interbank Offered Rate (Libor) — the benchmark interest rate that underpins over $350 trillion in mortgages, loans, and derivatives globally. Barclays traders submitted false rates to benefit their derivatives positions, and during the 2008 financial crisis, the bank deliberately submitted lower rates to appear healthier than it really was.

The manipulation was brazen and frequent. Emails showed traders directly asking the employees responsible for rate submissions to 'keep the libor fixing at 5.39' because 'we got a big position in 3m libor.' A Barclays employee told the New York Fed: 'We know that we're not posting an honest Libor, and yet we are doing it, because if we didn't do it, it draws unwanted attention on ourselves.' On June 27, 2012, Barclays settled with US and UK regulators for a combined $450M (£290M) — the first bank to settle in what became the largest financial benchmark scandal in history.

The fallout was immediate. CEO Bob Diamond and Chairman Marcus Agius resigned within a week. Barclays' share price dropped sharply. The scandal triggered global investigations of over 20 banks, resulting in more than $9 billion in total fines. The Wheatley Review led to fundamental reform of Libor, including criminal sanctions for manipulation. Tom Hayes, a former trader at UBS and Citigroup, was convicted by a UK jury and sentenced to 14 years (reduced to 11 on appeal). Libor was phased out by end-2021, replaced by reformed benchmarks that base submissions on actual transactions.

Why it happened

  • Barclays traders manipulated Libor submissions for years to profit on their derivatives positions — directly asking rate submitters to set rates that would benefit their trading books.
  • During the 2008 crisis, Barclays deliberately submitted false low Libor rates to pretend it was financially healthier than it was — a deception that undermined a $350T benchmark relied upon globally.
  • The manipulation was acknowledged internally and even to the New York Fed — but no one stopped it, and Barclays kept rigging rates for years until regulators finally caught up.
  • Barclays was fined $450M, its CEO resigned within days, and the scandal uncovered $9B+ in fines across 20+ banks — rate-rigging was industry-wide, not a few bad apples.
What it cost$450M fine; CEO resigned; $9B industry finescostly

The lesson

Libor is the most important number in finance. Barclays learned it could game it and kept doing so until regulators made it stop. That is not a risk failure — it is a culture failure.

Aftermath

Bob Diamond resigned as Barclays CEO on July 3, 2012, four days before his scheduled testimony to Parliament. Marcus Agius resigned as chairman the same week. Antony Jenkins was appointed CEO with a promise to restore Barclays' reputation but was fired in 2015. The scandal triggered the Wheatley Review, which overhauled Libor governance and created criminal penalties for benchmark manipulation. Over 20 banks and brokerages were investigated globally, paying more than $9B in combined fines. Tom Hayes was the first individual convicted and served 5.5 years. Libor was phased out by end-2021.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →