Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Strategic decision · 2019–2025

Baling Technology moved its dinosaur show to a 580M yuan Guilin theater — it never opened

An auto-parts maker's culture unit relocated a dinosaur stage show to a new venue, then sued its builders over construction instead of opening it.

Baling Technology · Impression Dinosaur · 2022-05-01

What happened

Baling Technology, a listed Chinese auto-parts manufacturer, had diversified into culture and entertainment through its subsidiary Impression Dinosaur, which staged "The Vanishing Dinosaurs" at Beijing's National Stadium starting in 2018. The show was suspended in April 2019 when the stadium needed to be converted for the 2022 Winter Olympics, and Impression Dinosaur signed a cooperation agreement to relocate the production to a purpose-built theater in Guilin, budgeted at 580 million yuan.

The relocation depended on a large steel support structure, or truss, that had to carry the show's lighting and screens. The builders and Impression Dinosaur disagreed over whether the truss should be installed as part of the main building's construction or only after the venue itself was handed over — a sequencing dispute that stopped work in May 2022 with the venue still incomplete.

By 2023 the project had absorbed more than 400 million yuan without opening, and Impression Dinosaur's own finances had gone negative, with unpaid balances of about 172 million yuan. Both sides sued each other; a Guilin court dismissed the claims in February 2024, and Guangxi's higher court ruled in May 2025 to terminate the cooperation agreement and sent the dispute over damages back for retrial.

Why it happened

  • The relocation plan depended on a single unresolved construction sequence — the truss — that neither side had settled contractually before work began.
  • Continuing to fund a stalled venue rather than settling the dispute early let the unpaid balance and legal costs compound for years before any performance could recoup them.
  • A listed company running an unrelated entertainment subsidiary meant construction litigation, not audience demand, decided whether the show would ever reopen.
What it cost580M yuan planned; over 400M yuan spent, still unopenedcostly

The lesson

Relocating a production is a construction project first. An unresolved sequencing dispute between builder and tenant can freeze the money already spent for years before a ticket is sold.

Aftermath

As of mid-2025 the Guilin venue remained unopened; Guangxi's high court had terminated the cooperation agreement and sent the damages dispute back to a lower court for retrial.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →