The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2013
AT&T held a phone up to the 9/11 memorial lights and tweeted 'Never Forget'
AT&T tweeted a photo of a smartphone held against the 9/11 Tribute in Light on the 12th anniversary. The phone was product placement.
AT&T
What happened
On September 11, 2013 — the 12th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks — AT&T's official Twitter account posted an image showing a smartphone held up against the darkened New York skyline, appearing to photograph the Tribute in Light memorial (two columns of light representing the Twin Towers). The text read 'Never Forget.'
The backlash was immediate. Social media users accused AT&T of using a national memorial as product placement — the smartphone was prominently framed in the image, making it impossible to separate the tribute from the brand. Critics called it 'tacky,' 'gross,' and 'the worst kind of marketing.'
AT&T deleted the tweet and apologised, saying they removed it because it was in 'poor taste.' Other brands commemorated 9/11 the same day without similar controversy — the difference was the phone. American Express and others posted memorial messages without featuring their products.
Why it happened
- The phone was the problem: a memorial image with a product prominently in frame is product placement — the tribute and the advertisement cannot be separated.
- The date made it irreversible: on a national anniversary of a mass-casualty event, there is no version of 'featuring your product' that reads as respectful.
- The contrast was damning: other brands posted simple memorial messages without products and faced no backlash — AT&T's version was distinguishable only by the phone.
- The deletion confirmed the error: removing the tweet was the right call, but it also confirmed that someone had approved it — the failure was in approval, not just posting.
The lesson
A national memorial is not a backdrop for your product. If the image does not work without the phone, the image is not a tribute — it is an ad.
Sources
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
AT&T throttled 'unlimited' data plans for years — $60M FTC settlement
TracFone sold 'unlimited' data, then throttled and cut off heavy users
Vodafone's 'The Nation's Network' claim kept getting banned
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.