Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2026

AOX's store display said CCS 'verified' its water filters — CCS had done no such thing

AOX displayed the consumer watchdog's logo with the line 'our findings were verified by CCS'. CCS accredits no one. Undertaking and public clarification.

AOX · 2026-03-31

What happened

AOX, a Singapore water-filter company, promoted its products in physical stores with an impressive-looking endorsement: the official logo of the Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore (CCS), reproduced in its marketing materials alongside the statement 'Our findings were verified by Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore'. There was one problem: CCS had verified nothing. The agency said it had not reviewed or verified AOX's claims — and does not accredit businesses at all.

On 31 March 2026 CCS publicly announced it had taken AOX to task. Using the logo with the false verification statement was an unfair trade practice under the Consumer Protection (Fair Trading) Act — it misled consumers into believing a statutory board stood behind the product. Misusing CCS's logo was also an offence in itself under the Competition Act. Following CCS's intervention, AOX admitted committing the offence.

AOX gave CCS an undertaking: stop using the logo, refrain from unfair trade practices, and issue clarifications on its website and at its physical outlets. CCS chief executive Alvin Koh said claiming CCS verification where none was done misleads consumers, and warned businesses against misusing the logo. CASE president Melvin Yong said the action signalled that misleading marketing would not be tolerated.

Why it happened

  • A borrowed logo is a fabricated endorsement: CCS's mark in a store display told shoppers the watchdog stood behind the product — it had done nothing of the kind.
  • The offence was double: the false verification was an unfair trade practice, and misusing the logo was itself a Competition Act offence.
  • The remedy was public: an admitted offence, an undertaking, and clarifications in the very outlets where the display had stood.
What it costadmitted offence; public clarificationembarrassing

The lesson

Don't borrow the regulator's logo: AOX displayed CCS's mark and claimed verification — CCS had verified nothing, and the admission, undertaking and clarification followed.

Aftermath

CCS announced the case in a media release on 31 March 2026. AOX admitted the offence and undertook to stop using the logo and unfair trade practices, and to publish clarifications on aox.com.sg and in-store. CASE said it would keep working with CCS; false advertisements go to ASAS, unfair trade practices to CASE.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →