Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2008

Airborne sold a 'miracle cold buster' — the clinical study behind it was two guys

2008: Airborne paid $30M to settle false-advertising claims — it sold a 'miracle cold buster' backed by a 'clinical study' run from a two-man shell lab.

Airborne Health, Inc. · 2008-08

What happened

Airborne was invented by a schoolteacher with no medical training and sold as a 'miracle cold buster': take it on planes, in classrooms, at the office, and it would ward off germs, prevent colds and shorten the ones you caught. The founder toured Dr. Phil and Live with Regis and Kelly; sales passed $100 million by 2006. Behind the claims stood what the company called a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study.

The study was run by GNG Pharmaceutical Services — which ABC News revealed to be a two-man operation created specifically for the Airborne trial: no clinic, no scientists, no doctors, led by a man whose claimed Indiana University degree the university disavowed. In March 2008 Airborne agreed to $23.3 million in class-action refunds; on 13 August 2008 the FTC added $6.5 million, bringing the total settlement to $30 million. The Commission found no competent and reliable scientific evidence that Airborne prevented colds or protected anyone in crowded places.

The company denied wrongdoing, and its CEO offered the defence that 'the best proof that the product works was that 40,000 customers contact the company every year' — customer mail as clinical evidence. The order barred all unsubstantiated cold-prevention and germ-fighting claims and funded refunds of up to six purchases for buyers from 2001 to 2007.

Why it happened

  • The ads sold science — 'clinically proven', 'double-blind study' — and the science was a shell: a two-man lab created for the occasion.
  • When cure claims drew scrutiny, the brand pivoted to 'immune-system booster' — the vocabulary changed, the evidence did not.
  • Testimonials and fan mail were offered as proof of efficacy; regulators count studies, not letters.
What it cost$30M settlement; refund programcostly

The lesson

'Clinically proven' invites inspection of the clinic. A study run by a shell lab is worse than no study at all — it becomes the centerpiece of the enforcement complaint.

Aftermath

Airborne survived as a brand under new owners, but 'miracle cold buster' became the textbook substantiation case: $30 million across an FTC order and a class action, and a standing joke about what 'clinically proven' can hide.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →