The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2016–2019
AdvoCare's $150M FTC settlement — a pyramid scheme that paid out almost nothing
Oct 2019: the FTC called AdvoCare an illegal pyramid scheme. It paid $150M, its CEO was banned from MLM, and 72% of its distributors earned nothing in 2016.
AdvoCare International, L.P. · 2019-10-02
What happened
AdvoCare was a Texas-based multi-level marketer selling health and wellness products, most visibly its Spark energy drink, through a network of hundreds of thousands of distributors. The company pitched its business opportunity at conferences, webinars, conference calls, podcasts, social media posts, videos and print materials, promising ordinary people a 'life-changing financial solution' that would let them 'earn unlimited income, attain financial freedom, and quit their regular job.'
The FTC said the income claims were the engine of an illegal pyramid scheme. A distributor paid $59 to join and spent $1,200 to $2,400 on product to reach 'advisor' status, and compensation was then earned by recruiting more advisors who bought more product — not by selling to customers. The real earnings told the story: in 2016, 72.3% of AdvoCare distributors earned no compensation at all, another 18% earned between one cent and $250, and the annual distribution was nearly identical from 2012 through 2015. CBS reported that more than 90% of US distributors earned under $250 a year.
In October 2019 AdvoCare settled with the FTC for $150 million and agreed to be permanently banned from multi-level marketing, as were former CEO Brian Connolly and two top promoters, Carlton and Lisa Hardman, who also faced a $4 million judgment. The company denied the pyramid-scheme charge and said it shelved the MLM model. The settlement echoed the FTC's 2016 $200 million deal with Herbalife, which the agency had declined to call a pyramid scheme outright — this time it did.
Why it happened
- AdvoCare's compensation rewarded recruiting over retail sales, the structure the FTC defines as a pyramid scheme.
- The company pushed distributors to make inflated income claims — 'hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars a year' — to bring in new recruits.
- It built its pitch on a promise of financial freedom that fewer than a tenth of its distributors ever came close to earning.
The lesson
When marketing promises income the compensation structure cannot deliver, the recruiting pitch is the product the regulator reads. An income claim is only as safe as the earnings data behind it.
Aftermath
The order required AdvoCare to notify all distributors that downline-purchase compensation was ending. The company continued selling products through a single-level structure, but the ban ended its MLM model.
Sources
- FTC — Multi-Level Marketer AdvoCare Will Pay $150 Million To Settle FTC Charges It Operated an Illegal Pyramid Scheme
- CBS News — AdvoCare fined $150 million as FTC calls it a pyramid scheme
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Five Guys' 40th-birthday BOGO deal ran stores out of food — and cost $1.5M in bonuses
Gymshark paid influencers to look unpaid — a lawsuit says that's the whole strategy
Jordan Brand ended Zion Williamson's signature shoe line after six injury-hit years
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.