Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Product & Design · Operational decision · 1999

Michael Crichton's rewrites and reshoots turned an $85M film into a $160M one

The 13th Warrior's cost nearly doubled through the author's repeated rewrites and re-edits, closing at $61M worldwide as one of 1999's biggest bombs.

Buena Vista Pictures · 1999-08-27

What happened

Author Michael Crichton, adapting his own novel Eaters of the Dead into The 13th Warrior, took an unusually active role in the production alongside director John McTiernan, with an initial budget around $85 million for the historical action epic starring Antonio Banderas.

Crichton pushed through repeated, sweeping script changes and re-edits during and after filming, extending the production timeline and requiring costly reshoots that pushed the cumulative budget from around $85 million past $100 million and eventually to a reported $160 million once delays and marketing were included.

The film opened to $61 million worldwide, losing an estimated $98-129 million depending on how the full production and marketing cost is counted — making it one of the biggest box office bombs of 1999 relative to its budget.

Why it happened

  • Giving the source author extensive control over ongoing script changes during production removed the usual checks on cost and schedule.
  • Repeated re-edits after the initial cut signaled the film's fundamental structure wasn't resolved before large sums had already been spent.
  • The studio didn't set a hard budget ceiling as costs nearly doubled from the original plan across the extended production.
  • Delays compounded marketing costs on top of the already-inflated production budget, worsening the eventual loss.
What it cost$98-129M losscostly

The lesson

An author's passion for their own story doesn't come with the production discipline a studio needs to keep a budget from doubling.

Aftermath

The 13th Warrior became one of the most frequently cited box office bombs of its era relative to its budget, though it later developed a cult following on home video that its theatrical run never reflected.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →