返回档案库

案例库 · 广告与公关 · 市场决策 · 2013

这条还没译成中文,下面是英文原文。

A teenager's photo of an 11-inch 'Footlong' cost Subway a multi-year measuring program

A viral photo showed a Subway 'Footlong' at 11 inches. Class-action suits followed, and Subway spent four years under court order to actually measure its bread.

Subway · 2013-01

怎么回事

In January 2013, an Australian teenager posted a Facebook photo of a Subway 'Footlong' sandwich laid next to a tape measure showing 11 inches, not 12. The image went viral internationally; The New York Post measured seven Footlongs at a New York location and found four came in at 11 or 11.5 inches.

The name 'Footlong' was a product name, not a guaranteed measurement, and Subway's bread naturally varied in length during baking — but that distinction didn't survive a photo simple enough for anyone to check with a ruler. Class-action lawsuits alleging deceptive marketing were filed across the U.S. between January and June 2013.

A 2014 settlement produced no direct payout to consumers but required Subway to spend at least four years enforcing a 12-inch minimum: measuring tools at every location, sampling and measuring bread during compliance inspections, inspection of ovens and proofers, and updated manuals requiring the 12-inch standard rather than the 11.5-inch minimum previously in use. The settlement's final approval, in 2016, awarded $520,000 in attorney fees and $500 each to ten named plaintiffs — nothing to the broader consumer class.

为什么会这样

  • A name implying a precise measurement invites exactly the literal test a viral photo delivers, regardless of any fine-print disclaimer about natural variation.
  • Baking bread to a hard 12-inch minimum needs operational discipline at thousands of locations that a marketing name alone doesn't guarantee.
  • Subway's own manual set an 11.5-inch minimum against a 12-inch marketing name, so its documentation contradicted the advertising before any customer measured anything.
  • A single, easily-replicated photo — a sandwich next to a ruler — spreads faster than any corporate response can catch up to.
代价a four-year court-supervised measuring program, $520K fees丢脸

教训

A product name promising an exact measurement will eventually meet a customer with a ruler — if the internal standard doesn't match the sign, that gap is a lawsuit waiting on a viral photo.

后来呢

Subway operated under the court-ordered measuring and inspection regime through the settlement's term, and the episode became a widely cited example of how a single unverified viral image can force years of costly operational compliance regardless of the underlying claim's technical merit.

资料来源

发现哪里写错了?告诉我们。

Comments · 0

    登录 后就能评论。

    类似的案例

    这家公司栽倒的地方,别处有人漂亮地解开过。 第二意见 →