返回档案库

案例库 · 广告与公关 · 市场决策 · 2012

这条还没译成中文,下面是英文原文。

New Balance sold toning shoes as exercise — the science said they were shoes

2012: New Balance paid $2.3M to settle false-advertising claims over toning shoes — after Reebok's $25M and Skechers' $40M, the third shoe in the same trap.

New Balance · 2012-08

怎么回事

New Balance marketed its toning shoes — Rock&Tone, TrueBalance, the Aravon line — as superior to regular walking shoes: they would strengthen and tone leg muscles and burn more calories, simply by being worn. Retail sales of toning shoes hit $145 million in 2009 and more than $252 million in 2010. The FTC had already settled with Reebok for $25 million over the same claims; the science did not support them.

Three women filed the class action in 2011, and in August 2012 a Massachusetts federal judge gave preliminary approval to a $2.3 million settlement: refunds of about $100 per pair for buyers from January 2010 onward, plus an injunction barring New Balance from advertising muscle-strengthening benefits without a clinical study to back them.

The case is the latecomer's lesson in a regulatory sweep: the FTC had already priced the claim at $25 million against Reebok and $40 million against Skechers, yet New Balance kept selling it. Entering a claim the regulator has already ruled false does not make the claim truer — it makes the settlement cheaper only by comparison.

为什么会这样

  • The muscle-toning and calorie-burning claims had no clinical evidence behind them.
  • The FTC had already settled identical claims against Reebok and Skechers — the claim was known to be false.
  • The settlement fund bought the claim back at $100 a pair, plus an injunction demanding clinical proof.
代价$2.3M fund + claims injunction代价高昂

教训

When a regulator has already priced a claim false against two competitors, running the same claim is not late to market — it is knowingly false advertising.

后来呢

The settlement covered toning shoes bought from January 2010 to August 2012 and barred muscle-strengthening claims without clinical studies. The toning-shoe category collapsed as every major seller settled.

资料来源

发现哪里写错了?告诉我们。

Comments · 0

    登录 后就能评论。

    类似的案例

    这家公司栽倒的地方,别处有人漂亮地解开过。 第二意见 →