案例库 · 人事与团队 · 战略决策 · 2024
这条还没译成中文,下面是英文原文。
Hearst cut 200 magazine jobs to 'reimagine' teams — the union called it cruel
Nov 2024: about 200 staff at the publisher of Elle, Harper's Bazaar and Cosmo — 67 of them union — cut from NYC HQ; WGAE: 'needless, irresponsible.'
Hearst Magazines · 2024-11
怎么回事
In the week before Thanksgiving 2024, Debi Chirichella, president of Hearst Magazines — home to more than 25 US brands including Elle, Esquire, Cosmopolitan, Harper's Bazaar and Town & Country — sent staff a memo: the company had decided to 'reallocate resources to better support our goals and continue our focus on digital innovation while strengthening our best in class print products.' It would 'scale back in areas that do not support our core strategy' and 'eliminate certain positions as we reimagine our team structures.' The memo did not say which departments, or how many people.
The number came out anyway: around 200 employees, most based at Hearst Tower on Eighth Avenue. The Writers Guild of America East counted 197 people, 67 of them members of the Hearst Union. 'Today, the consistently anti-union Hearst Magazines became the latest media company to enact needless, irresponsible and cruel layoffs of editorial employees,' said WGAE executive director Sam Wheeler, adding that 'the small army of senior executives with make-work jobs and self-important titles, who add little to nothing to build Hearst's brands, apparently made it through today relatively unscathed.'
The cuts landed while Hearst pushed new machinery: the AURA digital advertising product, a subscription management platform, an expanded Hearst Global Solutions team in London — and a partnership with OpenAI. Readers, Wheeler argued, were the casualty: 'Readers go to Hearst because of the talent and craft of its editorial employees. These workers make Hearst what it is.' The industry told the same story — Condé Nast had cut 270 jobs a year earlier, Time had trimmed 15 per cent of its editorial staff in January, and Forbes, Sports Illustrated, Vice and BuzzFeed had all cut through the year.
为什么会这样
- The memo gave no departments and no headcount; the scale surfaced only through the union, which counted 197 names — editorial staff cut while senior ranks survived.
- Resources moved from editorial toward digital advertising products, subscription platforms and AI partnerships — the mastheads kept their names and lost the people who filled them.
- The cuts were timed days before Thanksgiving, in a year when every major US publisher was cutting; Hearst's memo called it long-term care for the business.
教训
When a publisher reallocates from editorial to 'digital innovation', the mastheads keep their names and lose the people who gave them one — the executives, as ever, survive.
后来呢
Hearst gave no further breakdown of the cuts; the WGAE kept the layoffs in the record as it moved toward contract fights with the company. The editorial titles continued to publish on the slimmed teams, while Hearst marketed its new advertising products and its OpenAI partnership as the growth story.
资料来源
- Hearst Magazines Hit By Layoffs — The Hollywood Reporter (Nov 21, 2024)
- Hearst Magazines lays off 200 employees — with most of them based at NYC headquarters — New York Post (Nov 29, 2024)
发现哪里写错了?告诉我们。
类似的案例
这家公司栽倒的地方,别处有人漂亮地解开过。 第二意见 →

Comments · 0
登录 后就能评论。