返回档案库

案例库 · 广告与公关 · 市场决策 · 2026

这条还没译成中文,下面是英文原文。

'It's buying you time' — the ASA banned Exhale Coffee's anti-ageing claims

Exhale's ads said its coffee protected telomeres and slowed cellular ageing. The ASA: no authorised health claim covers that for any coffee.

Exhale Coffee · 2026-07-22

怎么回事

Exhale Coffee, sold by Higham Miller Coffee Ltd, marketed high-polyphenol coffee on health claims. In a paid Instagram post seen in February 2026 the founder cited research claiming moderate coffee drinkers had 'telomeres equivalent to people five years younger': coffee 'is buying you time, it's protecting your DNA, it's slowing down aging at the cellular level'. The ad called it 'the healthiest coffee on earth', promised 'Polyphenols to support gut and brain health', and said testing was overseen by Dr Rupy, founder of The Doctor's Kitchen, as the company's chief science officer.

Exhale's defence leaned on the wrong register. It cited the UK's authorised health claim for polyphenols — which belongs to olive oil, not coffee — and lab certificates showing high antioxidant levels. To back its general health claims it pointed to magnesium and potassium levels meeting authorised nutrient-claim thresholds, although neither nutrient appeared in the ad.

On 22 July 2026 the ASA upheld the complaints. The anti-ageing, telomere, DNA and gut/brain claims were specific health claims, and none is authorised for coffee on the GB Nutrition and Health Claims Register. 'The healthiest coffee on earth' was a general health claim without an accompanying authorised specific claim, 'high in antioxidants' an unauthorised nutrition claim, and Dr Rupy's presence amounted to a health professional endorsing health claims, breaching CAP Code rule 15.6.3. The ad must not appear again; Exhale said it had stopped running and would amend future ads.

为什么会这样

  • Health claims run on a whitelist: food ads may only use claims listed on the GB register, and the one authorised polyphenol claim belongs to olive oil.
  • Evidence is not authorisation: peer-reviewed studies and lab certificates cannot substitute for an authorised claim — substantiation and permission are separate gates.
  • The doctor amplified the breach: presenting a chief science officer as the medical face of the testing reads as a health professional's endorsement, prohibited outright.
代价ad banned; health claims ruled unauthorised丢脸

教训

Health claims run on a whitelist: even credible studies don't let a food ad promise slower ageing unless the claim itself is authorised — and for coffee, none is.

后来呢

The ASA's ruling of 22 July 2026 barred the ad from appearing again and required future claims to be authorised on the GB Nutrition and Health Claims Register. Exhale confirmed the ad was no longer running and that it would amend future advertising.

资料来源

发现哪里写错了?告诉我们。

Comments · 0

    登录 后就能评论。

    类似的案例

    这家公司栽倒的地方,别处有人漂亮地解开过。 第二意见 →