返回档案库

案例库 · 广告与公关 · 市场决策 · 2019–2020

这条还没译成中文,下面是英文原文。

Bud Light's Super Bowl dig at rivals' corn syrup triggered a year of injunctions

Anheuser-Busch's Super Bowl ads said rival beers use corn syrup. MillerCoors sued, won an injunction forcing a packaging change, then lost on appeal.

Anheuser-Busch · MillerCoors · 2019-02

怎么回事

During the February 2019 Super Bowl, Anheuser-Busch ran ads for Bud Light emphasizing that rival light beers Miller Lite and Coors Light are brewed using corn syrup, part of a roughly $30 million campaign built around Bud Light's own corn-syrup-free brewing process.

MillerCoors sued in March 2019, arguing the campaign had a 'nefarious purpose' to mislead consumers into thinking corn syrup remained in the finished beer, when it says the corn syrup is only a fermentation aid that doesn't survive into the final product. A federal judge partially agreed, barring specific language from future Bud Light ads in May 2019, then issuing a broader injunction in September 2019 that stopped Anheuser-Busch from using 'no corn syrup' claims and icons on Bud Light packaging altogether.

Anheuser-Busch appealed, and in 2020 the Seventh Circuit reversed, ruling the brewer was free to keep running the comparative campaign. What began as a Super Bowl ad had by then cost both sides more than a year of litigation, forced Bud Light to alter its packaging during the injunction period, and ended without the clear win either side had first claimed.

为什么会这样

  • Comparative advertising built on a factual ingredient can still mislead if the audience draws a conclusion — 'contains corn syrup' — the process doesn't support, and a court initially agreed.
  • Anheuser-Busch committed to the packaging claim before the legal question was settled, so the injunction forced a mid-campaign change a pre-cleared claim would have avoided.
  • Both companies spent over a year in litigation over one Super Bowl ad's framing, showing a comparative claim built for maximum sting can become a prolonged legal cost regardless of who wins.
代价year-plus litigation; forced packaging change代价高昂

教训

A comparative ad built on a technically true but easily misread fact invites exactly the lawsuit it got — a court doesn't need a claim false, only misleading, to force a mid-campaign packaging change.

后来呢

The case became a frequently cited precedent in comparative-advertising law for how false-advertising claims are evaluated on consumer impression rather than literal truth, and for how quickly an injunction can force real-world packaging changes even before a final ruling.

资料来源

发现哪里写错了?告诉我们。

Comments · 0

    登录 后就能评论。

    类似的案例

    这家公司栽倒的地方,别处有人漂亮地解开过。 第二意见 →