Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Product & Design · Product decision · 2015–2018

A Wrinkle in Time: Disney's $130.6M loss on a $103M film

Ava DuVernay's $103M adaptation grossed $133M worldwide — and Disney's loss reached $130.6M per Deadline, one of 2018's biggest bombs.

Walt Disney Pictures · 2018-03-09

What happened

A Wrinkle in Time — Ava DuVernay's adaptation of Madeleine L'Engle's beloved 1962 novel, produced by Walt Disney Pictures — cost an estimated $103 million, making DuVernay the first woman of color to direct a $100 million live-action film. The milestone made the failure harder to separate from the film itself.

Released March 9, 2018, it grossed $100 million domestically and $133 million worldwide — barely above its budget. Deadline's annual cost analysis calculated the net loss at $130.6 million, one of the biggest bombs of 2018, and Yahoo Finance estimated Disney's loss at $86–186 million after the Q2 earnings report.

The failure was a rare case of a big-budget film with a beloved source and a celebrated director that simply did not connect: mixed reviews, confused marketing and an awkward adaptation of a structurally strange novel combined to produce Disney's most expensive miss of the year.

Why it happened

  • The novel's structure fought the film: L'Engle's book is a philosophical journey, not a plot machine, and the adaptation's attempts to make it a blockbuster pleased neither fans of the book.
  • The marketing sold wonder it could not deliver: the trailers promised epic visuals, and the film's mixed reception turned the gap between promise and product into the story.
  • The milestone made the failure political: as the first $100M film by a woman of color, its miss was read as a verdict on representation budgets, and Disney's cautious release plan amplified the loss.
What it costNet loss $130.6M; $133M gross vs $103M budgetcostly

The lesson

A beloved book is not a film script: A Wrinkle in Time's philosophical structure fought every blockbuster instinct, and $103M plus a historic milestone could not make the adaptation work.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →