Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2026

Vomar was 'the cheapest' twice in three weeks — the RCC called both ads misleading

'Cheapest eggs', then 'nowhere cheaper' asparagus — both claims fell apart against competitor prices. Two RCC rulings in three weeks for one supermarket.

Vomar · 2026-06-09

What happened

Around Easter 2026, supermarket chain Vomar advertised: 'The cheapest eggs are at Vomar', backing the slogan with excerpts from the Algemeen Dagblad and Hart van Nederland. The quotes were cut and pasted — the original reports said Aldi, Dirk, Lidl and Nettorama charged the same prices. On 19 May 2026 the Advertising Code Committee ruled the ad misleading: 'cheapest' tells consumers the price is lower than everyone else's, and withholding the competitors was a misleading omission. Vomar's defence — the quotes were technically accurate and consumers could look up the articles — was rejected.

Three weeks later Vomar was back before the committee, this time over a spring flyer calling its asparagus 'nowhere cheaper' — without any conditions. The Consumentenbond showed that rival Dirk sold Dutch white asparagus of the same quality for less. Vomar's defence shifted: first the asparagus wasn't comparable, then Dirk did not sell Dutch white asparagus at all. The RCC chairman found the evidence sufficient and on 9 June 2026 ruled the claim unfair.

Two upheld complaints in three weeks, both brought by the Consumentenbond, both ending in a recommendation to stop advertising this way. The thread running through them: absolute price claims are measured against the whole market, not against a carefully edited excerpt of it.

Why it happened

  • Selective quoting is misrepresentation: the quoted reports named four competitors at the same price — cutting that out flipped their meaning.
  • Absolute claims invite comparison: 'nowhere cheaper' is a claim against every rival's shelf, and Dirk's asparagus disproved it.
  • The defences failed in sequence: 'the quote is technically accurate', then 'they don't sell it at all' — both rejected, the evidence decided.
What it costtwo claims ruled misleading; told to stopembarrassing

The lesson

'Cheapest' means cheaper than everyone: quote a survey selectively or ignore a rival's shelf and the ad misleads — twice in three weeks, the RCC told the same supermarket.

Aftermath

The egg ruling of 19 May 2026 was final, with no appeal possible; the asparagus ruling of 9 June 2026 recommended Vomar cease such claims, with an objection window to the end of June. Both complaints came from the Consumentenbond.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →