The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2026
Vomar was 'the cheapest' twice in three weeks — the RCC called both ads misleading
'Cheapest eggs', then 'nowhere cheaper' asparagus — both claims fell apart against competitor prices. Two RCC rulings in three weeks for one supermarket.
Vomar · 2026-06-09
What happened
Around Easter 2026, supermarket chain Vomar advertised: 'The cheapest eggs are at Vomar', backing the slogan with excerpts from the Algemeen Dagblad and Hart van Nederland. The quotes were cut and pasted — the original reports said Aldi, Dirk, Lidl and Nettorama charged the same prices. On 19 May 2026 the Advertising Code Committee ruled the ad misleading: 'cheapest' tells consumers the price is lower than everyone else's, and withholding the competitors was a misleading omission. Vomar's defence — the quotes were technically accurate and consumers could look up the articles — was rejected.
Three weeks later Vomar was back before the committee, this time over a spring flyer calling its asparagus 'nowhere cheaper' — without any conditions. The Consumentenbond showed that rival Dirk sold Dutch white asparagus of the same quality for less. Vomar's defence shifted: first the asparagus wasn't comparable, then Dirk did not sell Dutch white asparagus at all. The RCC chairman found the evidence sufficient and on 9 June 2026 ruled the claim unfair.
Two upheld complaints in three weeks, both brought by the Consumentenbond, both ending in a recommendation to stop advertising this way. The thread running through them: absolute price claims are measured against the whole market, not against a carefully edited excerpt of it.
Why it happened
- Selective quoting is misrepresentation: the quoted reports named four competitors at the same price — cutting that out flipped their meaning.
- Absolute claims invite comparison: 'nowhere cheaper' is a claim against every rival's shelf, and Dirk's asparagus disproved it.
- The defences failed in sequence: 'the quote is technically accurate', then 'they don't sell it at all' — both rejected, the evidence decided.
The lesson
'Cheapest' means cheaper than everyone: quote a survey selectively or ignore a rival's shelf and the ad misleads — twice in three weeks, the RCC told the same supermarket.
Aftermath
The egg ruling of 19 May 2026 was final, with no appeal possible; the asparagus ruling of 9 June 2026 recommended Vomar cease such claims, with an objection window to the end of June. Both complaints came from the Consumentenbond.
Sources
- Consumentenbond: Vomars asperge-reclame oneerlijk bevonden (9 June 2026)
- Consumentenbond: Vomars reclame voor eieren misleidend (19 May 2026)
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Albert Heijn's to-go price tag made a €3.95 sandwich look like €3, and the RCC upheld it
Lidl's '€16.78 cheaper basket' ad was suspended in Portugal — the comparison was rigged
Hydro Service ignored the ad watchdog's binding order — so it published their name
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.