Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Finance & Accounting · Financial decision · 2007–2023

A £150m diamond hoard backed the pitch to investors — liquidators found £100,000 of stones

Vashi raised money on the strength of a diamond hoard it said was worth over £150 million; when it collapsed, the safes held a small fraction of that.

Vashi · Diamond Manufacturers Ltd · 2023-04-04

What happened

Diamond Manufacturers Ltd, trading as Vashi, was a London-founded direct-to-consumer diamond and jewellery retailer built by founder Vashi Dominguez from 2007. Dominguez raised outside investment — including from high-profile backers such as Pret A Manger's former CEO Clive Schlee, ICAP founder Lord Spencer and Phones 4u billionaire John Caudwell — partly by pointing to a diamond stockpile he said was worth more than £150 million, offered as security investors could fall back on if the retail business underperformed.

The company's own internal sales figures for 2020 and 2021 were roughly £5.4 million and £5.1 million; the accounts it filed with Companies House for those same years claimed £53.6 million and £105.4 million — figures investors relied on when deciding to put more money in. Former staff later told reporters that stores had few customers on an ordinary day and that they were told to pose as shoppers to make the floor look busy.

The company was wound up and liquidators from Teneo appointed on April 4, 2023. When the safes were opened, the diamond stock actually on hand was valued at roughly £100,000 to £114,000 — a small fraction of the sum used to attract investment. The liquidation left unsecured creditors, including investors, with claims totalling around £170 million.

Why it happened

  • Investors were shown a stockpile valuation as collateral without independent verification of what stock the company held, and kept relying on that figure across rounds rather than re-checking it.
  • Sales figures reported to Companies House diverged roughly tenfold from the company's own internal sales data for the same years, and that gap went unchallenged until the business collapsed.
  • The retail operation kept presenting itself as thriving — reportedly staging customer traffic — well past the point its actual trading would have raised the alarm.
What it cost~£170m in creditor and investor claims; company liquidatedcatastrophic

The lesson

A collateral figure that backs an entire investment pitch needs independent verification before the money moves, not after the company has already collapsed and the safe is finally opened.

Aftermath

Liquidators pursued recovery action, including a statutory demand against Vashi Dominguez for a separate personal debt, as a step toward a possible bankruptcy petition. Dominguez left the UK after the collapse and could not be reached for comment on the discrepancies; investors who approached the Serious Fraud Office and the Metropolitan Police reported being redirected between the two agencies, and no criminal investigation had been opened as of the reporting reviewed.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →