The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2026
Szentkirályi's website suggested PET plastic had no environmental cost
Hungary's best-known water brand said its bottles were '100% recyclable' and implied PET did no harm. GVH closed the case with commitments, not a fine.
Szentkirályi Magyarország · 2026-05-08
What happened
Szentkirályi Magyarország, Hungary's best-known mineral water brand, marketed its bottles with green claims: '100%-ban újrahasznosítható' (100% recyclable), 'Gyűjtsd szelektíven!' (collect it separately) and 'Palackból palackot, 25% RePET' (bottle to bottle, 25% recycled PET). On its website the commercial communication went further, suggesting that the use of PET raw materials has no harmful effect on the environment. The GVH opened its investigation in summer 2024.
The Competition Council split the case. The 'bottle to bottle, 25% RePET' label claim, used between 23 March 2021 and 25 August 2022, was cleared: the company proved its bottles contained at least 25% recycled material. The website content was not cleared — the GVH found it could mislead consumers into believing PET use has no negative environmental impact. No fine followed: the Council accepted a commitment package instead.
The commitments, made binding on 8 May 2026 (case VJ/35/2024), require a compliance programme built on the GVH's green-marketing guidelines, internal training, a review of the website communication, and quarterly publication — until the end of 2029 — of the actual share of PET bottles returned through Hungary's deposit scheme, shown as time-series charts.
Why it happened
- Suggesting PET use has no harmful environmental effect had no evidence behind it — green claims need the same substantiation as any other.
- The '25% RePET' claim survived because it could be proved; the website narrative could not.
- Avoiding a fine still meant years of obligations — the real return rate must be published quarterly until 2029.
The lesson
Green claims live or die on proof: Szentkirályi's '25% RePET' survived because it was documented, but its suggestion that PET does no harm bought a GVH case and years of reporting.
Aftermath
The GVH closed case VJ/35/2024 on 8 May 2026 by making Szentkirályi's commitments binding: a green-marketing compliance programme, internal training, a website review and quarterly publication of actual PET return rates until the end of 2029. No fine was imposed.
Sources
- GVH: A második „PET-palackos” eljárását is lezárta a GVH (8 May 2026)
- hvg.hu: Elfogadta a Szentkirályi Magyarország vállalásait a GVH (8 May 2026)
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Nestlé's 'No.1 pediatrician-recommended' formula ad fell — it never produced the study
Fürst's window display claimed the only 'Original' Mozartkugel — Salzburg enjoined the ad
Proviande said 75% of Swiss farm animals get outdoor access — by headcount it was 15%
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.