Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Trading & Investing · Financial decision · 2023

Silicon Valley Bank bet on long-term bonds — and a bank run destroyed it in 48 hours

SVB invested deposits in long-term bonds. When rates rose, the bonds lost value. A tweet-triggered bank run drained $42B in one day. Collapsed in 48 hours.

Silicon Valley Bank · 2023-03-10

What happened

Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), the 16th-largest bank in the US and the primary bank for Silicon Valley startups, invested a large portion of its deposits in long-term Treasury bonds and mortgage-backed securities during the low-interest-rate period of 2020-2021.

When the Federal Reserve raised interest rates aggressively in 2022-2023, the value of SVB's bond portfolio fell significantly. The bank was sitting on approximately $15 billion in unrealized losses. When SVB announced a $2.25 billion stock offering to shore up its capital on March 8, 2023, it triggered panic among its tech-sector depositors.

Venture capitalists advised their portfolio companies to withdraw their deposits. In a single day, depositors attempted to withdraw $42 billion — a bank run accelerated by social media and group chats. SVB collapsed on March 10, 2023, the second-largest bank failure in US history. The case illustrated how a concentrated depositor base, social media amplification and interest rate risk can combine to destroy a bank in 48 hours.

Why it happened

  • SVB invested deposits in long-term bonds during low rates; rising rates created $15B in unrealized losses.
  • The bank's depositor base was concentrated in tech startups, which moved money in large blocks.
  • A stock offering announcement triggered panic; VCs advised portfolio companies to withdraw.
  • $42B in withdrawal attempts in one day; SVB collapsed in 48 hours.
What it cost$42B run; second-largest US bank failure; FDIC takeovercatastrophic

The lesson

A bank run in the age of social media takes hours, not days. SVB's depositors were connected by VC group chats. The interest rate risk was the kindling; social media was the spark.

Aftermath

SVB was taken over by the FDIC. The Federal Reserve created an emergency lending facility to prevent contagion. The case prompted a re-examination of bank regulation for mid-size institutions and the role of social media in financial panics.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →