The encyclopedia · Finance & Accounting · Financial decision · 2018
Suruga Bank's loan growth was built on forged documents — the FSA stopped it
Suruga Bank grew fast lending to property investors. A probe found staff had forged loan files for years; Japan's regulator banned new lending for six months.
Suruga Bank · 2018-10
What happened
Suruga Bank was a regional lender based in Shizuoka, Japan, that had grown rapidly by making loans to individual investors buying rental property, especially shared houses and small apartment buildings. The loans were its engine: they grew the loan book and, with it, the share price.
The growth was built on bad paper. A third-party investigation committee reported in September 2018 that the forgery and falsification of loan applications and related documents had been widespread, and that many employees, including an executive, were involved. Sales staff and property sellers had altered borrowers' income and savings figures so that loans would be approved.
Japan's Financial Services Agency responded on 5 October 2018 with a six-month partial business suspension order, banning Suruga from issuing new real-estate investment loans from 12 October 2018 to 12 April 2019. The regulator cited a lack of appropriate credit risk management and of measures to prevent malfeasance, and ordered the bank to submit a business improvement plan by the end of November 2018.
For a bank whose business was those loans, being told to stop making them for half a year was a severe blow. Suruga had to shrink and rebuild its lending controls, its shares fell, and its name became shorthand in Japan for the reckless investment-property lending that several banks and property sellers had been practising.
Why it happened
- Loan growth was the metric the bank rewarded, so sales staff had an incentive to get applications approved by any means, including forging income and savings figures
- The bank treated document checks as a formality rather than a control, so falsified applications passed because nobody was responsible for catching them
- Management failed to build credit risk management and anti-malfeasance measures that matched the speed of the lending — exactly the gap the regulator cited
- The loans were concentrated in a single hot market, investment property, so when underwriting failed the whole book was exposed at once
The lesson
A loan book that grows on forged applications is not growing at all — it is accumulating risk that a single investigation will turn into a regulator shutting the tap. Growth is not a control.
Aftermath
Suruga Bank spent the following years shrinking its property-loan book, strengthening its controls and working through losses and provisions on the bad loans. The case prompted Japan's regulator to scrutinise investment-property lending across other regional banks and lenders, several of which were found to have similar practices. It remains a standard Japanese example of what happens when loan growth is pursued without the controls to keep it honest.
Sources
- FSA (Japan) — ministerial press conference on Suruga Bank's share-house financing problems and ongoing inspection
- Mainichi — FSA slaps Suruga Bank with partial business suspension order over loan scandal
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
An apparel contract manufacturer posted a loss almost as big as its entire revenue
Cool Japan Fund lost ¥54B exporting Japanese culture — now it may be scrapped
A ¥6.3B rescue couldn't stop a ¥23.7B writedown at China's mall giant
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.