Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Strategic decision · 2011

Solyndra got a $535M U.S. loan guarantee — then Chinese solar panels killed it

Solyndra got $535M from the DOE for cylindrical solar panels — the price of silicon dropped 89% and it was bankrupt before the factory was finished.

Solyndra

What happened

Solyndra was founded in 2005 by Chris Gronet to manufacture cylindrical CIGS thin-film solar panels. The technology was designed to capture direct, indirect and reflected light, making it suitable for flat rooftops without tilting. In 2009, the U.S. Department of Energy issued a $535 million loan guarantee to Solyndra under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act — the first recipient of the program.

The company built a $733 million factory (Fab 2) in Fremont, California. Between 2009 and mid-2011, the price of polysilicon dropped roughly 89% due to Chinese manufacturers' advances in the Siemens process. Conventional crystalline silicon panels became dramatically cheaper, destroying Solyndra's cost advantage. The company's panel efficiency was about 8.5% — far below the 12-14% cell efficiency it advertised.

Solyndra filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on 31 August 2011, laid off 1,100 employees, and ceased all operations. Taxpayers lost approximately $528 million on the loan. An FBI investigation found no criminal wrongdoing. Solyndra recovered about $52.5 million through antitrust settlements with Chinese solar manufacturers Yingli and Trina Solar.

Why it happened

  • The bet on CIGS thin-film cylindrical panels was undercut when the price of conventional polysilicon dropped 89% between 2009 and 2011, making Solyndra's technology uncompetitive on cost
  • The $733 million factory was built with borrowed government money, leaving no margin for error when the market shifted against the technology
  • Panel field efficiency of 8.5% was far below the 12-14% cell-level efficiency advertised, meaning customers got less power than promised
  • Solyndra was the first recipient of the DOE loan program, creating a political firestorm when it failed and making it harder for follow-on clean energy companies to secure funding
What it cost$528M taxpayer loss; $733M factory for obsolete techcostly

The lesson

A government loan guarantee does not protect a company from market forces — when the technology bet is wrong, the subsidy just makes the failure bigger.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →