Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Product & Design · Product decision · 2013–2024

Skull and Bones: Ubisoft spent 10 years and $200M on a pirate game that won't pay it back

Ubisoft spent a decade and $200M turning an Assassin's Creed spinoff into a standalone pirate game; it launched to under 1M players and won't recoup its cost.

Ubisoft · 2024-02-16

What happened

Skull and Bones began as an expansion of Assassin's Creed IV: Black Flag's ship-combat mechanics, then was spun off into its own standalone pirate game. Development stretched roughly a decade, through more than three creative director changes and a series of delays, with reported spend reaching around $200 million.

The game launched February 16, 2024, priced at $70. Within weeks it had drawn less than one million total players, a figure that included an 8-hour free trial period — well short of the launch numbers expected of an AAA title at that budget.

Industry reporting citing sources close to Ubisoft said the company did not expect to recoup its development costs from the game, an unusual admission for a title still being sold at full price.

Why it happened

  • Repeated creative-director turnover over a decade meant the game never settled on an identity, drifting between an Assassin's Creed expansion and a standalone pirate game.
  • Pricing it as a $70 premium release while the genre's comparable live-service titles skewed cheaper or free-to-play left little room for players to justify trying it.
  • By the time it shipped, the market had already absorbed years of anticipation and leaks, so the actual release arrived without the novelty a decade-long wait should have built.
What it cost~$200M development cost; under 1M players at launchcostly

The lesson

A project that can't settle on what it is after a decade of development rarely finds an audience once it finally ships.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →