The encyclopedia · Engineering & Operations · Operational decision · 2013
Rana Plaza collapsed — 1,134 dead because brands valued speed over safety
A 9-story building with garment factories collapsed in Bangladesh on April 24, 2013. 1,134 workers died, 2,500 were injured, and brands looked away.
Rana Plaza · Primark · Benetton · Walmart · 2013-04-24
What happened
On April 24, 2013, Rana Plaza, a nine-story commercial building in Savar, Bangladesh, collapsed without warning at 8:57 am. The building housed five garment factories producing clothing for at least 29 international brands including Primark, Benetton, Zara, and Walmart. The death toll reached 1,134 with approximately 2,500 injured — the deadliest garment-factory disaster in history and the deadliest structural failure of the modern era.
The building was a disaster waiting to happen. Originally built with fewer floors on a filled-in pond, four upper stories were added illegally without permits or supporting walls. Heavy sewing machines and diesel generators exceeded the structure's capacity. The day before the collapse, large cracks appeared; a bank and shops on lower floors closed immediately. Sohel Rana, the building owner, declared it safe and ordered workers back. Factory managers threatened to withhold a month's pay from anyone who refused.
At least 29 international brands sourced from the factories, but only nine contributed to the compensation fund. Primark paid the largest share at $12.4 million. The disaster led to the Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh, a legally binding agreement between brands and unions that inspected over 1,600 factories. Walmart and 14 other North American companies refused to sign and created a non-binding alternative. The murder trial against Sohel Rana and 41 others was still ongoing as of 2021.
Why it happened
- Built on a filled-in pond. Four upper floors added illegally without permits or supporting walls. Heavy machinery exceeded the capacity of a structure never designed for industry.
- Cracks appeared the day before. Shops closed. Rana declared it safe and managers threatened to dock pay from workers who stayed. 1,134 died because production mattered more than cracked concrete.
- Only 9 of 29 brands contributed to compensation. The world's cheapest labour dressed the world's most profitable labels, and when the building fell, most brands disappeared.
The lesson
When brands outsource production to unsafe buildings, they own the risk. Rana Plaza proved a building with cracks is never safe — no matter how many paychecks depend on ignoring them.
Aftermath
1,134 dead and 2,500 injured. Only 9 of 29 brands contributed to the Donors Trust Fund; Primark paid $12.4 million. The Accord on Fire and Building Safety inspected over 1,600 factories, but Walmart and 14 North American brands created a non-binding alternative. Sohel Rana was arrested fleeing to India and sentenced to 3 years for corruption in 2017. The murder trial against him and 41 others was unresolved as of 2021. Bangladesh amended labour law and factory inspection, but the fashion industry's dependence on unsafe outsourcing continues.
Sources
- Wikipedia — 2013 Savar building collapse (Rana Plaza; April 24, 2013; 1,134 dead; 2,500 injured; 9 stories; illegal construction; 29 brands; Accord on Fire and Building Safety; Sohel Rana)
- BBC — Rana Plaza factory collapse: 1,134 dead in Bangladesh
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Apple's China supply chain bet: one COVID lockdown stopped iPhone production
Rana Plaza collapsed with 1,134 garment workers inside — the day after cracks were found
Bhopal gas leak killed thousands — Union Carbide cut safety to save $1.25M
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →

Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.