Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Product & Design · Product decision · 2014

Orkut was Google's first social network — then Facebook outgrew it and Google killed it

Orkut was a pioneer in social networking, dominating Brazil and India — but Facebook's growth outpaced it and Google shut it down in 2014.

Google

What happened

Orkut was launched in January 2004 as a 20% project by Google engineer Orkut Büyükkökten. It was one of the earliest social networks and became the most visited website in Brazil and India by 2008. At its peak it offered 45 languages and had over 700,000 users in India alone.

The platform suffered from neglect and security issues. A major redesign in October 2009 disabled the private messaging system, causing messages to be lost. Security worms infected over 700,000 users. Google's attention shifted to Google+, which was prioritised over Orkut's development.

Google announced Orkut's shutdown on 30 June 2014, citing that Facebook, YouTube, Blogger and Google+ had outpaced its growth. The platform was shut down on 30 September 2014. By that time 55.5% of its traffic came from Brazil and 18.4% from India — a niche service rather than a global platform.

Why it happened

  • Google prioritised Google+ over Orkut, starving the original platform of engineering resources and innovation
  • A disastrous 2009 redesign disabled private messaging, breaking a core feature without warning
  • Repeated security worms and session hijacking vulnerabilities eroded user trust over years
  • Facebook's rapid growth made Orkut irrelevant outside Brazil and India, where network effects had created local dominance
What it costSocial pioneer shut down; 55% of traffic was Brazilembarrassing

The lesson

A platform that cannot retain engineering investment from its parent company is already dead — it just takes a few years for the shutdown to be announced.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →