Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Product & Design · Strategic decision · 2025

Bona bet its entire cash flow on a ¥1B submarine film that grossed ¥393M

Bona's chairman said the company had 'welded' all its cash onto Operation Leviathan. The ¥1B epic grossed ¥393M; Bona lost ¥1.06B in six months.

Bona Film Group · 2025-01-28

What happened

Bona Film Group built China's blockbuster business on patriotic action films — Operation Mekong, Operation Red Sea — and pushed the formula to its limit with Operation Leviathan (蛟龙行动), the country's first nuclear-submarine film. Chairman Yu Dong said at a Beijing film forum in April 2024 that Bona had concentrated all its money on the picture: the company's cash flow was 'welded' to it, and smaller films had to stop until it was finished. Public reports put the budget at ¥1B, five times Operation Red Sea's.

Released into the Spring Festival window on January 28, 2025, the film faced Ne Zha 2, which took ¥10.27B. Operation Leviathan reached ¥378M after 17 days; on February 14 the distributor announced it was leaving theaters to return as a re-edited 'special edition' — two weeks after Yu Dong had declared the film would never be pulled. The special edition opened August 30 after six months of rework; Bona's half-year report put the film's total box office at ¥393M.

The bill landed in Bona's accounts: a net loss of ¥1.056B for the first half of 2025, down 661.93% year on year, which the company attributed to the market performance of films it had invested in. The full-year 2025 loss was ¥1.46B — a third consecutive annual loss.

Why it happened

  • Bona concentrated essentially all production capital on one title and paused its slate to fund it; when the film failed there was nothing else to absorb the blow.
  • The Spring Festival window belonged to Ne Zha 2 (¥10.27B); the other films split what was left, and entering with the window's most expensive title maximized exposure to that squeeze.
  • The studio dismissed criticism as paid attacks and publicly ruled out withdrawal, then withdrew two weeks later — no contingency plan survived contact with the audience.
What it cost¥1B budget vs ¥393M gross; ¥1.46B loss in 2025costly

The lesson

Never weld the company to one title. Bona paused its slate to fund a single ¥1B film, so one bad window became a ¥1.46B year — a box-office miss became a balance-sheet crisis.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →