Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Advertising & PR · Marketing decision · 2018

Leon's and The Brick buried financing fees in fine print — settled with $1.5M donated

Feb 2018: Leon's and The Brick each donated $750K in furniture — buy-now-pay-later ads that buried fees in fine print, five years after the Bureau sued.

Leon's Furniture Ltd. · 2018-02

What happened

Leon's and The Brick — two banners of Canada's biggest furniture retailer — sold deferred-payment plans with ads that made borrowing look free. The Bureau alleged the buy-now-pay-later promotions left customers paying more than the advertised price: processing and administrative fees, delivery fees and taxes sat in the fine print instead of the offer.

The Bureau had launched legal proceedings in July 2013, calling the advertising deceptive; Leon's defended the plans as good for consumers. Five years later, after mediation in the Ontario Superior Court, the case settled on 20 February 2018: each banner agreed to donate $750,000 worth of home furnishings to Canadian charities over two years, and both committed to the Bureau's guidance on disclaimers and fee disclosure in financing ads.

Deputy Commissioner Josephine Palumbo's line carried the standard: consumers expect and deserve truth in advertising. The case was Canada's marker on deferred-payment marketing — and the pattern outlived it: in November 2024 the Bureau obtained a court order advancing a new investigation into Leon's and The Brick's marketing practices.

Why it happened

  • The ads sold free-looking credit while fees — processing, delivery, taxes — waited in the fine print.
  • Fine print cannot contradict the headline offer: the Bureau treated the undisclosed fees as part of the claim.
  • Five years of litigation ended in donated furniture — the cost was the verdict, not the money.
What it cost$750K furniture donated each; disclosures fixedembarrassing

The lesson

A financing offer is one claim, headline to fine print: fees hidden in disclaimers make the advertised price misleading.

Aftermath

Both banners followed the Bureau's disclaimer and fee-disclosure guidance under the settlement. Six years on, the Bureau opened a fresh investigation into their marketing practices, obtaining a court order in November 2024.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →