The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Strategic decision · 1677–1824
Johor hired the Bugis to win one war — and bought five masters it could never dismiss
Johor brought in Bugis mercenaries to take back its throne. They stayed, made the sultan a puppet, and ran the kingdom for over a century.
the Johor Sultanate · Sultan Abdul Jalil Shah IV · Sultan Ibrahim Shah · Raja Sulaiman · Raja Kechil · the Opu Bugis Lima Bersaudara (Five Opu Daeng brothers)
From historyHistory and classical literature, legend included. An analogy to think with, not a modern precedent.
What it means today
For a company that outsources a mission-critical capability: the vendor who wins your biggest battle holds the leverage over your next move. The longer they stay indispensable, the more your strategy becomes theirs.
What happened
In his war with the Minangkabau kingdom of Jambi, and then in the succession crisis that followed, Johor reached for outside strength. Sultan Ibrahim Shah (1677–1685) engaged the help of the Bugis in the war with Jambi. Johor won the war in 1679, but in a weakened position as the Bugis refused to go home and the Minangkabaus of Sumatra began to assert their own influence.
The bill presented itself in the next succession. Dissatisfied with Raja Kechil's accession to the throne, the son of Sultan Abdul Jalil Emperor Shah IV, Raja Sulaiman, asked Daeng Parani of the Bugis to help him reclaim the throne. In 1722 Raja Kechil was dethroned with the assistance of the Bugis, and Raja Sulaiman became the new Sultan of Johor.
But Sulaiman was a weak ruler and became a puppet of the Bugis. Daeng Parani's brother, Daeng Merewah, made Yam Tuan Muda (crown prince), was the actual controller of Johor. From 1760 to 1784 the Bugis completely dominated the sultanate, intermarrying into the royal family and holding the office of Yam Tuan Muda between themselves, until the Bugis role was only carved out by the Dutch and British partition of the kingdom in the London Treaty of 1824.
Why it happened
- It treated a mercenary army as a tool to be used for one war and set aside, without asking what a force that had just won the kingdom would demand in return
- It let the victory be delivered by partners who were stronger than the throne they had restored, so the crown passed to a sultan who governed only as their puppet
- It never built a native power base, letting the intermarried Bugis lineages hold the office of Yam Tuan Muda, so control of the kingdom rested permanently in the hands of the people it had hired
The lesson
Never let a partner you cannot dismiss deliver your most important victory. The ally who wins your war holds the leash on your throne, and the longer they hold it the more it becomes their throne.
Aftermath
Johor's sultans remained Bugis-dominated through the 18th century, with the Bugis lineages holding the office of Yam Tuan Muda and passing it between themselves. The Bugis role in Johor was only finally carved out by outside power: the Dutch and British partition of the kingdom set by the London Treaty of 1824 split Johor into spheres of influence, with Riau and Lingga passing to the Dutch and the lands north of Singapore to the British.
Sources
- Kerajaan Johor 1721-1824: meneliti penglibatan dan peranan Bugis-Makassar — Abdullah Zakaria Ghazali, Malaysia Dari Segi Sejarah 37 (2009)
- Johor Sultanate — Wikipedia
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
More like this
Makassar's Bugis vassals switched to the VOC — and took the kingdom with them
Sendo shut down twice — FPT's 14-year e-commerce bet collapsed in two stages
Hung Vuong Corporation went from 18,000 billion VND revenue to bankruptcy in three years
Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →
Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.