The encyclopedia · Product & Design · Product decision · 2011–2019
Google+ tried to be the social layer across everything Google — and became a ghost town
Launched in 2011 to take on Facebook, Google+ was force-fed into every Google product. Users barely engaged, a data flaw surfaced, and Google shut it down.
Google · Facebook · 2011-06-28
What happened
Google+ launched in June 2011 as Google's fourth attempt at a social network, and this time the company meant it: it was built to challenge Facebook head-on, with features like Circles for sorting contacts and Hangouts for group chat. Facebook took it seriously enough that Mark Zuckerberg reportedly declared a company-wide 'lockdown' to respond. Google+ grew fast on paper — tens of millions of signups within months — but the numbers hid a problem.
Hardly anyone actually used it. By one measure, users spent an average of just a few minutes a month on Google+, against hours on Facebook; The New York Times likened it to a 'ghost town.' Google responded by redefining Google+ not as a destination but as a 'social layer' woven across all its products — YouTube comments, Gmail, the +1 button — so that signing up for Google+ became an incidental byproduct of using anything Google. It was engagement by integration rather than by choice.
The strategy never produced a real social network. In 2018, Google disclosed a software flaw in the Google+ API that could have exposed some users' personal data to outside developers, and — combined with chronically low engagement — that was the end. Google shut the consumer Google+ down in April 2019, eight years after launch. The product that was supposed to be Google's answer to Facebook became a byword for the limits of distribution: a billion users piped in is not the same as a community that wants to be there.
Why it happened
- Google had unmatched distribution but no compelling reason for people to socialize on its network; users already had Facebook.
- Redefining Google+ as a forced 'social layer' across Google products produced signups but not genuine engagement.
- Metrics like 'monthly active users' were inflated by incidental usage from other Google services, masking the ghost town underneath.
- A disclosed data-exposure flaw in 2018 gave Google the final reason to shut down a product that had never found its purpose.
The lesson
You can't bolt a social network onto a utility and call it engagement. Google had billions of users but no reason to socialize. Forced signups aren't users — build the reason to come, not the rule.
Aftermath
Google+ is taught as the classic case of a company mistaking distribution for demand: Google could put a social network in front of a billion people and still fail to make them care. Its shutdown in 2019 closed out a decade of failed Google social products (Orkut, Buzz, and others). Some of its components lived on — Hangouts evolved into other tools, and the Photos feature became the successful standalone Google Photos. The lesson for platform owners is humbling: you can require people to pass through your product, but you cannot require them to want it.
Sources
spotted an error? The club wants to know.
Comments · 0
Sign in to join the comments.