Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Product & Design · Product decision · 2003

Studios bet a $75M film on the Bennifer tabloid romance, and it made $7M

Gigli leaned on Affleck and Lopez's real-life relationship as its main marketing hook, and set a record for the largest second-week box office drop.

Revolution Studios · Columbia Pictures · 2003-08-01

What happened

Revolution Studios and Columbia Pictures produced Gigli, a romantic comedy written and directed by Martin Brest starring Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez, on a budget of about $75 million, leaning heavily on the tabloid attention around the two stars' real-life romance — dubbed 'Bennifer' — as the film's central marketing hook.

The finished film's story and tone drew widespread confusion and mockery in early reviews, but the marketing had already built the entire campaign around the stars' off-screen relationship rather than the on-screen story itself.

Gigli opened weakly and grossed just $7 million worldwide against its $75 million budget, an estimated $47 million loss. It set a box office record for the largest second-week drop, at 81.9%, as word of mouth turned decisively against it.

Why it happened

  • Marketing built around the stars' off-screen romance created interest in the couple, not necessarily the film's actual story or quality.
  • Nobody tested whether tabloid interest in the relationship would translate into ticket sales for the specific film it was attached to.
  • The extreme second-week drop signaled the marketing hook generated curiosity that one viewing was enough to exhaust.
  • The budget assumed a tabloid-driven opening would sustain over multiple weeks, when it collapsed almost immediately.
What it cost~$47M losscostly

The lesson

Tabloid curiosity about two stars' real relationship is not the same demand as wanting to see the film they made together — it gets you an opening weekend, not a run.

Aftermath

Gigli became one of the most frequently cited examples in Hollywood of tabloid-driven marketing failing to translate into sustained box office, and it significantly damaged both stars' standing in the years that followed.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →