Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Finance & Accounting · Financial decision · 2022

BlockFi lent $275M to FTX — then followed it into bankruptcy

Crypto lender BlockFi filed Chapter 11 on Nov 28, 2022 with 100,000+ creditors, weeks after pausing withdrawals over its exposure to the collapsed FTX.

BlockFi · 2022-11-28

What happened

BlockFi, founded in 2017, was one of the large crypto lenders: customers deposited tokens into interest-bearing accounts, and the firm lent the assets on. At its peak the previous year it managed more than $15 billion in assets. In June 2022, with crypto markets in distress, BlockFi secured a $250 million rescue revolving credit line from FTX. Then FTX collapsed. On 11 November 2022 BlockFi paused withdrawals, and on 28 November it filed for Chapter 11 in the US Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey in Trenton, case no. 22-19361.

The petition listed assets and liabilities each in the $1 billion to $10 billion range, more than 100,000 creditors, and roughly $257 million of cash on hand. The exposure ran both ways to the same name: BlockFi had lent $275 million to FTX US — making its rescuer's affiliate one of the largest claims in the filing — alongside exposure through collateralised loans to Alameda Research. And on top of the customer claims sat $30 million owed to the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

In the space of one month, BlockFi went from a lender holding a rescue credit line to a debtor with six figures of creditors. The interest paid to depositors was funded by lending their deposits to institutions — and when one of those institutions failed, the model failed with it.

Why it happened

  • Deposits were re-lent to a handful of counterparties; when FTX and Alameda failed, customer balances became unsecured claims in someone else's bankruptcy.
  • The June rescue tied BlockFi's liquidity to FTX — the same firm whose November collapse froze it.
  • The $275 million loan to FTX US meant the lender held a major claim in its own rescuer's estate; the hedge and the hazard shared a name.
What it cost$1B–$10B liabilities; 100,000+ creditorscostly

The lesson

A lender that concentrates its deposits in one counterparty is one failure away from becoming a creditor. BlockFi's lifeline and its largest exposure were the same name.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →