Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Product & Design · Product decision · 2016

MGM funded 80% of a $100M Ben-Hur remake nobody asked for, and lost $120M

The remake of a film already considered a classic grossed just $94M worldwide, and MGM, which covered most of the budget, absorbed the bulk of the loss.

MGM · Paramount Pictures · 2016-08-19

What happened

MGM and Paramount co-financed a remake of Ben-Hur, an epic already famous from its Oscar-winning 1959 adaptation and a story audiences had little evident appetite to see retold, with MGM covering more than 80% of the roughly $100 million production budget.

The studios bet a new director's take and updated effects would justify remaking a story so closely associated with an earlier definitive version, without a strong marketing hook explaining why this new version needed to exist.

Ben-Hur opened weakly and closed with $94 million worldwide, a fraction of what the combined production and marketing spend required. Analysts estimated the total loss at $120 million, with MGM absorbing the largest share given its majority financing stake.

Why it happened

  • The studios greenlit a remake of a story with no audience demand signal, betting production value alone would justify a new version.
  • MGM's outsized financing share concentrated the downside risk on one studio without a correspondingly strong reason to expect a hit.
  • Marketing struggled to articulate why this Ben-Hur needed to exist next to the well-remembered earlier film.
  • Nobody tested audience appetite for a remake of this specific story before committing the budget.
What it cost~$120M losscostly

The lesson

A story's fame doesn't create demand for a new version of it — sometimes it's the opposite, since the earlier version already owns the audience's memory.

Aftermath

Ben-Hur's failure became a widely cited example in industry discussions of studios remaking beloved classics without a clear creative or commercial rationale, reinforcing caution around similar projects.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this

    Somewhere, someone solved the problem this company failed at. 2nd Opinion →