mistake.club

The encyclopedia · Trading & Investing · Financial decision · 2021

Archegos blew up $10B at the banks that lent to it — hidden behind total return swaps

Bill Hwang's family office bet big, leveraged, and concentrated — using swaps so no bank saw the whole picture. When it blew up in 2021, banks lost ~$10B.

Archegos Capital Management · Credit Suisse · 2021-03-26

What happened

Archegos Capital Management was the family office of Bill Hwang, a former hedge-fund manager who had run Tiger Asia Management. By 2020 it managed tens of billions of dollars, and Hwang had built enormous, highly leveraged bets on a handful of stocks — ViacomCBS, Discovery, Baidu, Vipshop and Farfetch among them. Crucially, much of the exposure was held through total return swaps: derivatives where the bank holds the actual shares, so Archegos didn't have to disclose how much it had staked.

The swaps also meant that no single bank could see the whole picture. Archegos did business with several banks at once — Credit Suisse, Nomura, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and others — each extending huge leverage against the same concentrated positions, largely unaware of how exposed the others were. When the underlying stocks fell in late March 2021, Archegos couldn't meet its margin calls, and on March 26 the banks began frantically selling billions of dollars of shares to protect themselves.

The forced selling drove the stocks into a free fall — ViacomCBS fell about 27% in a day — and the losses landed on the banks. The total damage to lenders was around $10 billion, with Credit Suisse taking the biggest hit at roughly $5.5 billion and Nomura close behind; Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley escaped with smaller losses by moving faster. Hwang lost billions personally and was later convicted of fraud and sentenced to 18 years in prison. The collapse was compared to Long-Term Capital Management.

Why it happened

  • Archegos used total return swaps to build huge, concentrated, leveraged positions without disclosing them, so no one regulator or bank saw the full exposure.
  • Multiple banks lent against the same positions, each unaware of the others' exposure, so the system as a whole was far more leveraged than any participant realized.
  • The bets were concentrated in a few stocks, so a single move against them triggered margin calls the firm couldn't meet.
  • Banks competed to lend to a lucrative client and under-priced the risk, prioritizing fees over prudent risk management.
The bill~$10B in bank losses (Credit Suisse ~$5.5B)costly

The lesson

If your risk view depends on what each counterparty tells you, you don't have one. Swaps let Archegos hide the same bet from every bank. Ask what you can't see, and treat concentration as danger.

Aftermath

The Archegos collapse cost the world's banks roughly $10 billion and became the largest single loss from a fund blow-up since LTCM, drawing comparisons to that 1998 meltdown. Credit Suisse's $5.5 billion loss compounded the troubles that led to its eventual takeover by UBS in 2023. Regulators and banks revisited how total return swaps can hide concentration, and Bill Hwang was convicted of fraud and racketeering and sentenced to 18 years. The lesson: leverage you can't see is the most dangerous kind, and a client who is everyone's best customer may be everyone's biggest risk.

Sources

spotted an error? The club wants to know.

Comments · 0

    Sign in to join the comments.

    More like this