返回档案库

案例库 · 财务与会计 · 财务决策 · 2013–2017

这条还没译成中文,下面是英文原文。

Sprig raised $56.7M to cook and deliver every meal itself — and starved

Sprig ran its own kitchens and couriers for on-demand healthy meals in San Francisco; on 26 May 2017 the $56.7M startup shut its app, unable to find a buyer.

Sprig · 2017-05

怎么回事

Sprig launched in San Francisco in 2013 with the heaviest model in food delivery: it sourced its own ingredients, cooked in its own kitchens and ran its own couriers, serving a rotating daily menu delivered hot in as little as fifteen minutes. Investors put in $56.7 million to scale what was effectively a restaurant, a logistics company and a farm supplier at once.

Vertical integration meant every meal carried the full weight of kitchens, staff and fleet. A Chicago expansion ended in layoffs and retreat; late pivots — walk-in pickup, a partnership with delivery marketplace Caviar — did not change the arithmetic.

On 26 May 2017 CEO Gagan Biyani announced Sprig would shut its app that day: 'the complexity of owning meal production through delivery at scale was a challenge.' Four years, two cities and $56.7 million ended in one apology to customers and staff.

为什么会这样

  • Owning kitchens, couriers and menus fixed its costs high in a market where marketplace rivals carried none of them.
  • Chicago proved the model didn't travel: the expansion collapsed into layoffs and retreat.
  • With unit economics unproven the business could not keep burning.
代价$56.7M raised, shut in four years代价高昂

教训

Sprig owned everything — sourcing, cooking, delivery — in a market won by marketplaces that owned nothing. Demand was never the problem; the cost of every meal was.

后来呢

Sprig's shutdown came in the wave that ended SpoonRocket and Maple and cut Munchery; the meal-delivery market consolidated around third-party platforms.

资料来源

发现哪里写错了?告诉我们。

Comments · 0

    登录 后就能评论。

    类似的案例

    这家公司栽倒的地方,别处有人漂亮地解开过。 第二意见 →