案例库 · 广告与公关 · 市场决策 · 2026
这条还没译成中文，下面是英文原文。
Ljus-Butiken's 'from 2,090 kr' lamp deal paired a crossed-out price from a different size
Ljus-Butiken offered a lamp 'from 2,090 kr' beside a crossed-out 3,990 kr, but the low price was the smallest size and the high the largest.
Postordergruppen i Göteborg AB · 2026-05-11
怎么回事
Ceiling lamp retailer Ljus-Butiken.se ran a campaign for its 'Sailing' taklampa showing a price 'from 2,090 kr' next to a crossed-out '3,990 kr'.
The lower price applied only to the smallest size of the lamp (60 cm), while the crossed-out price referred to the largest, most expensive model.
The complaints concerned whether the combination of the product image and the two prices misled consumers into thinking the prices referred to the same product.
The Reklamombudsmannen found the combination was likely to mislead the average consumer into believing the prices concerned the same product. The advertiser had removed the ad on 8 April 2026, but a retroactive correction does not excuse the violation. The ad was misleading, breaching Article 5 of the ICC Code.
为什么会这样
- A 'from' price and a crossed-out price side by side read as one product marked down, not two
- The smallest and largest sizes sharing a single picturelet the maths stay hidden
- Removing the ad after the fact could not undo the impression already given
教训
A saving is only honest if both prices belong to the same thing. Pairing a small-size 'from' price with a large-size crossed-out price makes the deal look bigger than it is.
后来呢
The Reklamombudsmannen found the lamp ad misleading, breaching Article 5 of the ICC Code. Ljus-Butiken had pulled the ad in April, but the correction came too late to excuse it.
资料来源
发现哪里写错了？告诉我们。
类似的案例
这家公司栽倒的地方，别处有人漂亮地解开过。 第二意见 →
Comments · 0
登录 后就能评论。