案例库 · 产品与设计 · 产品决策 · 2013–2018
这条还没译成中文，下面是英文原文。
Blurred Lines: a $7.4M verdict that made the year's biggest song a liability
The 2013 smash — 14.8M sales — was ruled to have copied Marvin Gaye; the jury awarded $7.4M, later cut to $5.3M, and Gaye got a writing credit.
Interscope Records · 2015-03-10
怎么回事
Blurred Lines — Robin Thicke's 2013 single featuring T.I. and Pharrell Williams, released on Interscope — was one of the best-selling songs of all time, with 14.8 million copies sold and the largest radio audience in history. It spent months at number one and defined the summer of 2013.
In March 2015, a federal jury found the song had infringed Marvin Gaye's 'Got to Give It Up': the unanimous verdict awarded Gaye's family $7.4 million in damages, later reduced to $5.3 million, and Gaye was added as a co-writer of the song. The Ninth Circuit upheld the infringement finding in December 2018.
The verdict turned the industry's most successful single into a cautionary tale: a song that had earned its writers tens of millions ended owing millions to the Gaye estate, and the case reshaped how pop producers handle genre-adjacent grooves — with every future hit measured against the copyright it might have touched.
为什么会这样
- The song was built on a groove it did not clear: 'Blurred Lines' openly acknowledged its debt to Gaye's sound, and the jury found the similarity was infringement, not homage.
- The creators' own testimony sank them: Thicke admitted in deposition to drug and alcohol use during the song's creation.
- The industry's math changed overnight: a hit that earns $10M+ and then pays $5.3M plus legal costs is a different asset, and the verdict made every uncleared homage a potential write-off.
教训
An homage is a liability until it is cleared: Blurred Lines sold 14.8 million copies and still ended owing $5.3M plus legal costs.
资料来源
发现哪里写错了？告诉我们。
类似的案例
这家公司栽倒的地方，别处有人漂亮地解开过。 第二意见 →
Comments · 0
登录 后就能评论。